The Unintended Revolution of 'Good Will' and Ticket Royalty in Cricket

In cricket, whenever a big tournament is mentioned, news usually starts from board announcements. However, a recent analysis shows how the common 'good will' practice of cricket boards is continuously affecting team financial policies. While big boards take hard stands against fraud or gambling, the aid or support given to smaller teams is far below expectations. Is this a planned policy, or just a coincidental inequality? It is a complex battle between the values of the game and commercial benefit. For example, a team with lower eligibility for aid or support has to cope with reduced challenges. It is observed that such teams also receive less benefit in the ticket market. Unlike big teams, smaller teams are not usually given 'committee' or 'royalty' by spectators, but this arrangement is increasingly rising for such teams. This increase can be seen in teams that are collecting much more royalty than expected revenue. Is this just an economic process, or does it directly affect spectator motivation? From the spectator side, it is observed that they are enthusiastic to buy tickets for teams with lower aid eligibility. This is a reverse trend, which changes the natural flow of the game. However, while smaller teams are receiving royalty, on the other hand, it is working as an attraction for spectators. It is seen that even teams with lower ticket prices are becoming popular among spectators. Is this just a statistical event, or is it a deep change in spectators' minds? Probably, it is a combination where financial benefit and game values are working together. The question is, will this method shape the future of cricket? Or is it just a temporary trend? In the coming days, how such policies will change by cricket boards and how spectators will react, it remains to be seen.